WALCROFT · INDEPENDENT AI ASSURANCE

AI can act.
Can you prove it acted correctly?

Organisations can have policies, permissions and monitoring in place and still struggle to prove those controls actually worked. WALCROFT independently tests whether the evidence supports the assurance being placed on AI and autonomous agents.

Built for consequential AI actions. Procurement · finance · operations · regulated workflows · autonomous agents
THE MISSING QUESTION

Not “do you have controls?”
“Can you prove they worked?”

AI governance often tells leaders what should happen. Logs and dashboards tell them what happened. WALCROFT tests whether the evidence is strong enough to justify the assurance management is relying on.

01

Declare

Management states the control and the assurance it believes it provides.

02

Evidence

Relevant records, approvals, logs and outputs are assembled for review.

03

Test

WALCROFT challenges whether the evidence actually corroborates the claimed control.

04

Assure

A clear independent judgement identifies confidence, limitations and assurance gaps.

LIVE ASSURANCE DEMONSTRATION

What assurance actually looks like.

Illustrative demonstration only. It shows the WALCROFT approach without exposing the underlying assessment methodology.

Autonomous procurement agent · transaction review LIMITED ASSURANCE
ILLUSTRATIVE TRANSACTION
£12,400 → £124,000

An autonomous agent was authorised to execute a procurement action. The final transaction value materially exceeded the intended value.

MANAGEMENT DECLARATION

Approval controls prevent material unauthorised spend.

EVIDENCE CONFIDENCE

Partial

Evidence supports parts of the control chain but does not fully corroborate the assurance claimed.

WALCROFT JUDGEMENT

Limited Assurance

A material assurance gap remains between control design and evidenced operation.

Why this matters: a policy saying approval is required is not evidence that approval prevented the action.
ASSURANCE GAPS

Make uncertainty visible.

WALCROFT does not turn weak evidence into false confidence. Where assurance cannot be substantiated, the gap is made explicit.

Control design Is the control capable of addressing the risk?
Control operation Is there evidence it actually operated?
Evidence integrity Is the evidence reliable enough to support the conclusion?
Evidence before confidence.

The objective is not to create another compliance dashboard. It is to give boards, executives, customers and assurance functions a defensible view of what can — and cannot — be relied upon.

WHY WALCROFT

Independent assurance for the agentic era.

Independent

Assurance is separated from the team making or operating the AI control.

Evidence-led

Judgements distinguish between what is declared, supported, sample-tested and independently verified.

Decision-useful

Material gaps are surfaced clearly so senior leaders can act rather than interpret another technical dashboard.

DESIGN PARTNER PROGRAMME

Help define the next standard of AI assurance.

WALCROFT is speaking with a small number of organisations using or preparing to use consequential AI and autonomous agents. Design partners can explore the assurance approach against a suitable use case and help shape what independent AI assurance needs to deliver in practice.

Design-partner participation does not imply certification, regulatory approval or endorsement.